Author: Md. Abu Bakkar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/2797-4480.1243
Download Full-Text PDF
Abstract: This study examines how gender shapes psychological experience across five of Shakespeare’s major plays: Macbeth, Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, and Twelfth Night. Existing scholarship treats Shakespeare’s tragic women, tragic men, and comic heroines as separate problems; this article asks whether one framework connects them. Its starting point is the reversal in psychological positions between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth: he resists killing on moral grounds and then grows recklessly violent, while she plans the murder with cold resolve and is later overwhelmed by guilt. The study asks whether this pattern recurs more broadly, and why. Drawing on Judith Butler’s account of gender performativity, R. W. Connell’s concept of hegemonic masculinity, and an expanded base of peer-reviewed scholarship, the analysis suggests this pattern reflects not a fixed male-female difference but an early modern ideology that assigned decisive violence to masculinity and restraining compassion to femininity, then dramatized a cost for characters who performed, resisted, or failed to sustain that role. Lady Macbeth’s “unsexing,” Hamlet’s misogyny, Othello’s demand for “ocular proof,” Lear’s fury at his “unnatural” daughters, and Viola’s cross-dressing are read as variations on this pattern, moderated by genre. The study’s contribution is this comparative framework, developed across the five plays examined.
Keywords: Shakespeare, gender performativity, hegemonic masculinity, feminist Shakespeare
criticism, genre
Download Full-Text PDF
